The Supreme Court on Friday has declined prayer seeking Governor’s rule in Jammu & Kashmir as sought by petitioner.
Last week on July 22, the apex court agreed to hear a plea seeking imposition of Governor’s rule in Jammu & Kashmir, under a provision of J&K Constitution, due to the prevailing law and order situation in the state.
The plea was mentioned before the bench by the counsel for JKNPP who said that Jammu and Kashmir has been “under siege of the security forces and the police for the past two weeks resulting in a total chaos, anarchy and disorder in the entire valley of Kashmir”.
The counsel said that Governor’s rule under section 92 of the Constitution of Jammu & Kashmir should be imposed.
The petition sought a direction to the Governor to dissolve the assembly of Jammu & Kashmir “which has failed to discharge its duties and functions”.
The bench also comprising justices FML Kalifulla and A M Khanwilkar asked the petitioners why they did not approach the Jammu and Kashmir high court for remedy.
The counsel said that the Jammu and Kashmir high court “has been locked up” as well and they can’t go anywhere else.
“The situation in Jammu and Kashmir has been chaotic and there is no public order in existence as such.”
It said “there is literally rule of the gun and the people in the Valley have no access to even water or medical stores.
“The people in Jammu and Kashmir have been forced to stay inside their house and homes without food, medicines or other essential commodities needed for human survival,” it alleged
The plea sought direction to the Governor of Jammu and Kashmir to intervene under section 92 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir and take over the administration in the state in the interest of security, safety and fundamental rights of the Indian citizens.